The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte SEDTA BOORANANUT, TOAPONG ROJANARIDPICHED,
and CHIEWCHARN SUNAWONG
_______________
Appeal No. 2006-1753
Application No. 09/732,037
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellants request that we reconsider our decision of Aug. 25, 2006, in
which we sustained the rejection of claims 2-6, 8-11, and 13-16 as unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We have reconsidered our decision of Aug. 25, 2006, in light of appellants’
comments in the request for rehearing, and we find no errors therein. We,
therefore, decline to change our prior decision for the following reasons.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007