Ex Parte Stagg et al. - Page 1



           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not         
           written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                                     

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                Ex parte TIMOTHY V. STAGG, RICHARD L. SHEEHAN, JR.                    
                                  and DEAN A. MINER                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2006-1760                                  
                             Application No. 09/728,697                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                    ON BRIEF                                          
                                   _______________                                    
          Before KIMLIN, TIMM and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                     
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 2,             
          4-9, 11, 13-18, 20-25, 27, 29-33, 35-39, 41, 42, 44-52 and 56,              
          all the claims remaining in the present application.                        
               Claim 1 is illustrative:                                               










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007