Ex Parte Sellen et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2006-1766                                                       
         Application No. 09/773,090                                                 
                                                                                   
              The invention is directed to a text processing system.  In            
         particular, an auxiliary screen functions as an independent word           
         processor, wherein a user is enabled to edit text in a manner              
         similar to that employed when using paper.                                 
              Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:          
              1.  Text processing apparatus comprising:                             
              a first text editing unit having a screen upon which text             
         may be displayed, and a first manual actuator by means of which a          
         user is able to interact with text displayed on the first screen;          
              a second text editing unit having a second screen upon which          
         text may be displayed, and a second manual actuator by means of            
         which a user is able to interact with text displayed on the                
         second screen; wherein                                                     
              the first and second actuators are independently operable,            
         and enable interaction with text displayed on respective screens           
         independently of each other; and                                           
              the first and second text editing units are connected to              
         each other to enable text to be imported from one unit directly            
         to another unit, thereby to enable text selected from a first              
         document displayed on one unit to be inserted directly at a                
         predetermined location in a document displayed on the other unit.          
              The examiner relies on the following references:                      
         Kashiwagi et al. (Kashiwagi)  6,396,598     May. 28, 2002                  
                                                   (filed Aug. 26, 1998)            
         Karidis et al. (Karidis)   6,727,894  Apr. 27, 2004                        
                                                    (filed Jun. 09, 2000)           
         Robotham et al. (Robotham)  6,704,024  Mar. 09, 2004                       
                  (effective filing date Aug. 07, 2000)                             


              Claims 1-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As                 
         evidence of obviousness, the examiner offers Karidis and                   

                                         2                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007