The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HEUM-II BAEK
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1771
Application No. 10/407,247
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 26 through 36.
The disclosed invention relates to the structure of a reflective LCD device.
Claim 26 is the only independent claim on appeal, and it reads as follows:
26. The reflective LCD device, comprising:
first and second substrates facing and spaced apart from each other;
a half wave plate and a polarizer that are formed in series on the second substrate;
a liquid crystal layer interposed between the first and second substrates;
a common electrode on a surface of the second substrate facing the first substrate, the
common electrode is formed of a transparent conductive material;
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007