Appeal No. 2006-1776
Application No. 10/075,976
and the file name for the media format information stored within the
database that is associated with the selected media type. As an example,
the actual media format information could include the size of block,
number of repeated blocks, size of the media and other format
information]
performing at least one of a printing of the package wrapper with the
windowed image thereon, a transmitting of the package wrapper image,
and a storing the package wrapper image. [See Lively para. 56 - to
produce a final print image for printing on one of the associated printers
70 at the printing facility 240]
It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have applied Acker’s
image editing tool to Lively’s custom gift wrapping device because of Lively’s explicit
recitation of using graphical image software applications [See Lively para. 27], of which
Acker is an embodiment, and Acker’s explicit recitation of the benefits of editing on a
group of still images [See Acker col. 1 lines 6-10], of which Lively’s catalog is an
embodiment.
Accordingly, we reject the two independent claims 1 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as unpatentable as obvious over Lively in view of Acker. We leave the consideration of
the applicability of these references to the remaining claims to the examiner.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007