The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHANNES WEDI and MARKUS KUJAT
____________
Appeal No. 2006-1779
Application No. 10/249,810
Technology Center 3700
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BAHR, LEVY and NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges.
BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-8,
10-13 and 15-17. Claims 8, 10 and 16 were amended and claims 9 and 14 were
canceled subsequent to the final rejection, thereby overcoming the rejections under
35 U.S.C. § 112 and the rejection of claims 9 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007