Ex Parte Chen et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                      
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                           

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                               
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                             Ex parte JOHN CHU CHEN and                                                             
                                             JAMES KENNETH WEDDELL                                                                  
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                                      Appeal 2006-1781                                                              
                                                   Application 10/230,015                                                           
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                            
                                                        ____________                                                                
                                               Decided:  September 28, 2006                                                         
                                                        ____________                                                                

                   Before KRATZ, GAUDETTE, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
                   KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                              

                                                           REMAND                                                                   
                           On consideration of the record, we determine that the above-identified                                   
                   application is not ready for a final decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134.                                    
                   Accordingly, we remand this application to the Examiner for further                                              
                   consideration and action not inconsistent with our opinion below.  37 C.F.R.                                     
                   § 41.50(a)(1).                                                                                                   







Page:  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007