The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN CHU CHEN and JAMES KENNETH WEDDELL ____________ Appeal 2006-1781 Application 10/230,015 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 28, 2006 ____________ Before KRATZ, GAUDETTE, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. REMAND On consideration of the record, we determine that the above-identified application is not ready for a final decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134. Accordingly, we remand this application to the Examiner for further consideration and action not inconsistent with our opinion below. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1).Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007