Ex Parte Furukawa et al - Page 2



             Appeal 2006-1786                                                                                  
             Application 10/322,859                                                                            

             insulating layer inclusive of any part of the diffused layers thereupon.  This                    
             appealed subject matter is adequately represented by independent claim 1 which                    
             reads as follows:                                                                                 
                          1.   A thermistor chip comprising:                                                   
                          an NTC thermistor element having end surfaces opposite each other                    
                   and mutually oppositely facing main surfaces extending between said end                     
                   surfaces;                                                                                   
                          outer electrodes on said end surfaces and end portions of said main                  
                   surfaces; and                                                                               
                          diffused layers formed entirely over said main surfaces including said               
                   end portions by subjecting an inorganic material and said thermistor element                
                   together to a firing process at 1000-1300oC, said end surfaces being not                    
                   covered by said diffused layers, said inorganic material having a higher                    
                   specific resistance than material of said thermistor element, said diffused                 
                   layers being formed proximally to all externally exposed surfaces of said                   
                   thermistor element and being free of any insulating layer inclusive of any                  
                   part of said diffused layers thereupon.                                                     
                   The references set forth below are relied upon by the Examiner as evidence                  
             of obviousness:                                                                                   
                   Oguro1                                 JP 63-316403                      Dec. 23, 1988      
                  Furukawa1                            JP 03-250603                      Dec. 28, 1989        
                   Claims 1-8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over                 
             Furukawa in view of Oguro, and claims 1-5, 7 and 8 are correspondingly rejected                   
             as being unpatentable over Oguro in view of Furukawa.                                             



                                                                                                              
             1Our understanding of these references is based on the English translations thereof               
             which are in the record of this application.                                                      

                                                      2                                                        


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007