Ex Parte Davis - Page 2


                Appeal No. 2006-1802                                                        Page 2                 
                Application No. 09/785,918                                                                         
                that, for example, on-line help can be obtained wherein the user and the helper are                
                viewing the same web site.  When a certain event, e.g., the pressing of a “help” key, is           
                detected at a server in a client server communication protocol, a browser session is               
                automatically shared between at least two clients, with one of the clients being on the            
                server side of the client server communication protocol.                                           

                       Independent claim 1 is representative, and is reproduced as follows:                        
                1. A method comprising:                                                                            
                       detecting an event at a server in a client server communication protocol; and               
                       upon detection of an event, sharing a browser session between at least two clients,         
                one of said clients being on the server side of said client server communication protocol.         
                       The examiner relies on the following references:                                            
                Picazo, Jr. et al. (Picazo)  5,432,907   Jul. 11, 1995                                             
                Quatrano et al (Quatrano)  6,748,420   Jun. 08, 2004                                               
                                                                       (filed Oct. 11, 2000)                       
                       Claims 1-6, 12-17, 21-28, and 30 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §103 as                     
                unpatentable over Quatrano in view of Picazo.                                                      


                       Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of                  
                appellant and the examiner.                                                                        


                                                  OPINION                                                          


                       In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. §103, it is incumbent upon the examiner to              
                establish a factual basis to support the legal conclusion of obviousness.  See In re Fine,         
                837 F.2d 1071, 1073, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).  In so doing, the examiner              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007