Ex Parte Holman et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2006-1814                                                                                             
               Application 10/365,314                                                                                           

                      Representative independent claim 8 is reproduced below:                                                   
                      8.  A device, comprising:                                                                                 
                      a hood attachable to a cable connector for a first cable, the cable connector attachable to a             
               substantially planar first circuit card, said hood attachable in a plane of the first circuit card, said         
               hood adapted to constrain a portion of the first cable to within a predetermined volume partially                
               defined by a thickness of the first circuit card, said hood adapted to constrain a portion of a                  
               second cable to within the predetermined volume.                                                                 
                      The following references are relied on by the examiner:                                                   
                      Little et al. (Little)               4,168,877             Sep.  25, 1979                                
                      Killian, Jr.                         4,787,858             Nov. 29, 1988                                 
                      Straub, Jr. et al. (Straub)           5,971,797             Oct.  26, 1999                                
                      Brown et al. (Brown)                  5,993,251             Nov. 30, 1999                                 
                      Claims 3, 5 through 9, 17 through 22, 24 through 27 and 29 stand rejected under U.S.C.                    
               § 102(b) as being anticipated by Brown.  On this same statutory basis the examiner considers                     
               Little as an anticipatory reference as to claims 30 through 36.  The remaining claims on appeal                  
               stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness as to claims 10 through 13                     
               and 16, the examiner relies upon Brown in view Killian, and as to claims 14 and 15, the                          
               examiner relies upon Brown in view of Straub.                                                                    
                      Rather than repeat the positions of the appellants and the examiner, reference is made to                 
               the substitute brief filed on September 15, 2005 and the reply brief filed on January 10, 2006 for               
               the appellants’ positions, and to the answer for the examiner’s positions.                                       






                                                               2                                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007