The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FRANK PELOSI, JR. ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1819 Application No. 10/102,445 ____________ HEARD: AUGUST 8, 2006 ____________ Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges. FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 12 through 20 and 23 through 31, all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims 1 through 11, 21 and 22 have been cancelled. Appellant’s invention relates to the problem of supporting an overlying flooring material at the juncture of flooring materials of different heights, at the transition region at the juncture between the different height materials, where the transition isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007