The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte ALICIA ANNE CHASTAIN, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH PAUL and DAVID MARK WENDT Appeal No. 2006-1829 Application No. 09/921,020 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge. This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16 and 18 through 21. The disclosed invention relates to a data processing method and system for researching highlighted text in an electronic book. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows: 1. A method in a data processing system for researching text in an electronic book, the method comprising: receiving a user input selecting the text from the electronic book, wherein the user input tags a beginning point and an ending point of any portion of text in the electronic book to form selected text and wherein the selected text is identified by a user after the electronic book isPage: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007