Ex Parte Chastain et al - Page 1




                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                              
                                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                         


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                           __________                                                                
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                           __________                                                                
                            Ex parte ALICIA ANNE CHASTAIN, CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH PAUL                                                   
                                                  and DAVID MARK WENDT                                                               
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-1829                                                           
                                                   Application No. 09/921,020                                                        
                                                           ___________                                                               
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                           ___________                                                               

               Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                



                       This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7, 9 through 16 and 18                         
               through 21.                                                                                                           
                       The disclosed invention relates to a data processing method and system for researching                        
               highlighted text in an electronic book.                                                                               
                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                    
                       1.   A method in a data processing system for researching text in an electronic book, the                     
               method comprising:                                                                                                    
                       receiving a user input selecting the text from the electronic book, wherein the user input                    
               tags a beginning point and an ending point of any portion of text in the electronic book to form                      
               selected text and wherein the selected text is identified by a user after the electronic book is                      





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007