Ex Parte Army et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       

                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                            
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                      ____________                                                            
                                          Ex parte DONALD E. ARMY, JR.,                                                       
                                             DOUGLAS L. CHRISTIANS                                                            
                                           and FREDERICK PEACOS, III                                                          
                                                      ____________                                                            
                                                    Appeal 2006-1849                                                          
                                                 Application 10/387,139                                                       
                                                Technology Center 3700                                                        
                                                      ____________                                                            
                                             Decided: November 14, 2006                                                       
                                                      ____________                                                            

                  Before GARRIS, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                  GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                         This appeal involves claims 1, 4, 9 and 10.  We have jurisdiction over                               
                  the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                     
                         We AFFIRM.                                                                                           









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007