The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DONALD E. ARMY, JR., DOUGLAS L. CHRISTIANS and FREDERICK PEACOS, III ____________ Appeal 2006-1849 Application 10/387,139 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Decided: November 14, 2006 ____________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1, 4, 9 and 10. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007