Ex Parte Scheer - Page 3



                   Appeal No. 2006-1854                                                                                            
                   Application No. 09/867,174                                                                                      

                                                  THE REJECTION AT ISSUE                                                           

                          Claims 11, 12, and 14 through 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                 
                   being unpatentable over Altendahl in view of Landvater.  Claim 13 stands rejected                               
                   under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Altendahl in view of Landvater and                             
                   Dietrich.  Throughout the opinion we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the                        
                   respective details thereof.                                                                                     
                                                               OPINION                                                             
                          We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections                                
                   advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner                            
                   as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration,                       
                   in reaching our decision, Appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs along with the                          
                   examiner’s rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the                    
                   examiner’s answer.                                                                                              
                          With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the                                 
                   examiner’s rejections and the arguments of appellant and the examiner, for the reasons                          
                   stated infra we will not sustain the examiner’s rejections of claims 11 through 20 under                        
                   35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                                                                
                          Appellant argues, on page 5 of the brief, that Altendahl teaches a system where a                        
                   single geographic destination for an item is required to be first established.  As such,                        
                   appellant argues, on pages 5 and 6 of the brief, that Altendahl does not:                                       
                          teach, or suggest at least the claimed elements of constructing a plurality of                           
                          alternative fulfillment plans for moving an item that is the subject of an order                         
                          from  a sourcing point to each of plural geographic locations within the supply                          
                          chain, evaluating each of the constructed plurality of alternative fulfillment plans                     
                          against a predetermined criteria, and then selecting for implementation one of the                       
                          constructed plurality of alternative fulfillment plans that most closely meets the                       
                          predetermined criteria to thereby position the item that is the subject of the order                     
                          at one of the plural geographic locations within the supply chain to thereby make                        
                          the item available to meet the order. (emphasis original)                                                




                                                                3                                                                  



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007