Ex Parte Mayers et al - Page 2



           Appeal No. 2006-1864                                                                     
           Application No. 10/167,922                                                               

           agent having a higher molecular weight than that of said low                             
           molecular weight retarding agent but being at least 500 Dalton                           
           and wherein said retarding agents are present in an amount                               
           effective to reduce the level of said sulfate ions and alkaline                          
           (earth) metal ions dissolved in said brine, thereby producing a                          
           high purity brine.                                                                       
                 The examiner relies upon the following references as                               
           evidence of obviousness:                                                                 
           Burns 2,902,418 Sept. 1, 1959                                                            
           Axelrad et al. 3,140,915 July 14, 1964                                                   
           (Axelrad)                                                                                
                 Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a process for                         
           making a high purity brine by adding retarding agents which                              
           reduce the level of sulfate and alkaline earth metal ions in the                         
           brine.  Appellants use a low molecular weight retarding agent                            
           and a high molecular weight retarding agent whose molecular                              
           weight is at least 500 Dalton and higher than the molecular                              
           weight of the low molecular weight retarding agent.  Both low                            
           and high molecular weight retarding agents may be phosphates.                            
                 Appealed claims 1-4, 6, 7, and 11 stand rejected under                             
           35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Burns in view of                           
           Axelrad.                                                                                 
                 Appellants have not set forth an argument that is reason-                          
           ably specific to any particular claim on appeal.  Accordingly,                           
           all the appealed claims stand or fall together with claim 1.                             
                                                -2-                                                 



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007