Ex Parte Bedding et al - Page 4


              Appeal No. 2006-1878                                                                 Page 4                
              Application No. 10/435,367                                                                                 

              additional cations, or positive ions, to counteract the anions, or negative ions, in the                   
              gastric acid.”  Specification, ¶ 27.  Polar lipids are utilized to achieve this effect.  Id.,              
              ¶ 28, ¶ 48.  The specification provides guidance on the types and amounts of the polar                     
              lipid that may be present in the dietary supplement.  Id., ¶ 49, 69.  The claim element,                   
              itself, however, does not contain any express words that would limit the quantity of polar                 
              lipid in the supplement.  The limitation that it strengthens the mucous gut membrane                       
              refers to a property or characteristic of the lipid when administered, but does not serve                  
              as a requirement that the amount of lipid present in the supplement be actually effective                  
              to achieve this effect.  Consequently, as we interpret the claim, any amount of polar lipid                
              in a dietary supplement would be sufficient to meet this claim limitation.  The soluble                    
              fiber and nutricine components have the same construction as the polar lipid                               
              supplement, where the component is required to have a specific property (“slows                            
              passage of foodstuff”; “increases” digestive tract integrity), but not to be present in a                  
              quantity necessary to achieve a result.                                                                    
                     During prosecution, the Board is required to give claims their broadest                             
              reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification.  In re Bond, 910 F.2d 831,                    
              833, 15 USPQ2d 1566, 1567 (Fed. Cir. 1990).  In the absence of clear and explicit                          
              wording in the claim that the recited components are present in amounts effective to                       
              treat and/or inhibit ulcers, we conclude that the claimed dietary supplement reads on the                  
              presence of these components in ineffective amounts, even in trace amounts.                                
                     In reaching this construction, we have recognized that the claim’s preamble                         
              states that the supplement is for use in treating ulcers.  Preamble language that merely                   
              states the purpose or intended use of an invention is generally not treated as limiting the                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007