Ex Parte Bedding et al - Page 18


              Appeal No. 2006-1878                                                               Page 18                 
              Application No. 10/435,367                                                                                 

              reason has been provided by the Examiner for the skilled artisan to have combined the                      
              references to have arrived at the claimed subject matter.                                                  


                                                       Summary                                                           
                     The Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-29, 31-33, 35-42, and 44-61 over prior art is                  
              affirmed.  Claim 43 is subject to a new ground of rejection.                                               


                                              Time Period for Response                                                   
                     No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal                      
              may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                                                                   
                     This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 CFR § 41.50(b)                      
              (effective September 13, 2004, 69 Fed. Reg. 49960 (August 12, 2004), 1286 Off. Gaz.                        
              Pat. Office 21 (September 7, 2004)).  37 CFR § 41.50(b) provides "[a] new ground of                        
              rejection pursuant to this paragraph shall not be considered final for judicial review."                   
                     37 CFR § 41.50(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS                               
              FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options                              
              with respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of the appeal as to the                   
              rejected claims:                                                                                           
                            (1) Reopen prosecution.  Submit an appropriate amendment of the                              
                     claims so rejected or new evidence relating to the claims so rejected, or                           
                     both, and have the matter reconsidered by the examiner, in which event                              
                     the proceeding will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                              
                            (2) Request rehearing.  Request that the proceeding be reheard                               
                     under § 41.52 by the Board upon the same record. . . .                                              







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007