The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEFFEN HASENZAHL and RALF JANTKE ____________ Appeal No. 2006-1903 Application No. 10/204,306 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WALTZ and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 16 and 17. Claims 1 through 12 and 18 are the only other claims pending in this application and stand allowed by the examiner (Brief, page 1; final Office action dated Aug. 25, 2004, page 1). We have jurisdiction pursuant to1 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1We refer to and cite from the revised Brief dated June 22, 2005.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007