Ex Parte Taylor - Page 1



                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                          
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                     
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                       Ex parte ALFRED A. TAYLOR                                                  
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                             Appeal No. 2006-1908                                                 
                                          Application No. 10/371,161                                              
                                            Technology Center 3700                                                
                                                 ____________                                                     
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                 ____________                                                     
             Before FRANKFORT, BAHR and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                     
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     
                    This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's                     
             final rejection of claims 1-3 and 9-11.  Claim 5 has been canceled.  The remaining                   
             claims 4 and 6-8 have been objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base                       
             claim.                                                                                               
                    We affirm.                                                                                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007