Appeal No. 2006-1910 Application No. 09/910,654 to store the agent coupon data electronically in view of the fact that ARC already taught that the coupon data could be stored in image form. Thus, appellant’s argument that there is a difference between image and data fundamentally misunderstands that an image can also convey data. Although ARC precludes the electronic storage of the agent coupon data, this is not the type of disclosure that constitutes a teaching away. The concept of teaching away refers to a teaching that would lead the artisan to believe that the path taken would not be technically or operationally feasible. The teaching in ARC against electronic storage has nothing to do with technical or operational feasibility. ARC wanted an image of the agent coupon to replace the physical version of the agent coupon already in use. In other words, ARC wanted something they could still look at in the same manner as a physical agent coupon. The standard set forth by ARC, however, has nothing to do with obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In fact, we agree with the examiner that ARC teaches that it was known that the agent coupon data could be stored electronically, but that such storage would not be acceptable for their purposes. Thus, ARC specifically recognized that the agent coupon data could be stored electronically, but ARC chose not to permit this form of verification of the ticket information. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007