Appeal No. 2006-1920
Application No. 10/846,504
CONCLUSION
To summarize,
• The rejection of claims 1, 2, 9, 19, 20, 33 and 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as
being anticipated by Magiawala, is not sustained.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may
be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JENNIFER D. BAHR ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANTON W. FETTING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
AWF/ki
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007