The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ROBERT C. SUNDAHL and LAWRENCE A. BOOTH JR.
_____________
Appeal No. 2006-1930
Application No. 09/976,199
Technology Center 3600
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before LEVY, NAPPI and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134(a) of the final rejection of
claims 1, 3 through 11 and 13 through 19. For the reasons stated infra we affirm the
examiner’s rejection of these claims.
Invention
The invention relates to a system and method for to compensate for degradation
of luminance of emissive displays. Claim 1 is representative of the invention and
reproduced below:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007