Ex Parte Manganaris et al - Page 5



                   Appeal No. 2006-1934                                                                                              
                   Application No. 09/798,833                                                                                        

                           The term Intrinsic Customer Value (ICV) is defined by appellants in the                                   
                   originally filed specification.  As identified by the examiner on page 3 of the answer,                           
                   appellants’ specification, on page 5, provides the following definition:                                          
                           The term "Intrinsic Customer Value" as used herein is defined as a particular                             
                           customer's (or group of customers with the same or similar characteristics)                               
                           expected value based on the historical value of other similar customers.                                  

                   Page 5 of appellants’ specification also states that while value in most cases refers to                          
                   money it may also refer to other values of a customer.  Further, the definition does not                          
                   mention relation to merchants, we note that page 12 identifies that the historical data may                       
                   be mined for just customers of a single merchant (one casino) or customers from all                               
                   merchants in a group (all casinos).  Thus, while appellants’ specification clearly suggests                       
                   that the scope of claim 1 includes the ICV, being monetary value to one merchant, we do                           
                   not find that the term ICV is limited to exclude non-monitory value or that the value                             
                   represents only value to one merchant.  Thus, we concur with the examiner’s holding that                          
                   the term ICV is limited to the customer’s expected value based upon the historical value                          
                   of other customers, where value is value to one or more merchants and is monetary or                              
                   other value to the merchant(s).                                                                                   
                           The term Historic Customer Value (HCV), is not specifically defined in                                    
                   appellants’ originally filed specification.  However, based upon the discussion of the ICV                        
                   being created from historical values (on page 5 of appellants’ specification), and the                            
                   discussion of mining data (on page 12 of appellants’ specification) we consider the term                          
                   HCV to be the past (historical) value of the customer to the merchant(s).  As discussed                           
                   above with respect to ICV, we do not find that the term HCV is limited to exclude non-                            
                   monitory value or that the value represents only value to one merchant.  Thus, we                                 
                   consider the term HCV to be historical value of the customer, where value is value to one                         
                   or more merchants and represents monetary or other value to the merchant(s).                                      
                           Claim 1 recites computing the ICV "based on an HCV of said customers from                                 
                   said set of customers that are similar to said customer of interest” and comparing “said                          
                   HCV and ICV of said customer of interest to develop a comparison result” and                                      


                                                                 5                                                                   



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007