Ex Parte Garnett et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is                     
               not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                   

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                          
                                                           __________                                                                
                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                           
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                           __________                                                                
                                                  Ex parte PAUL J. GARNETT,                                                          
                                          JAMES E. KING, MARTIN P. MAYHEAD,                                                          
                                                   AND PETER HEFFERNAN                                                               
                                                           __________                                                                
                                                      Appeal No. 2006-1937                                                           
               Application No. 10/215,651                                                                                            
                                                           ___________                                                               
                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                 
                                                           ___________                                                               
               Before THOMAS, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                   
                      This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-6 and 9-27.                                 
                       The invention pertains to computer storage systems.  In particular, information                               
               processing cartridges, so-called “blades” –because they resemble rectangular slabs or blades–,                        
               are removably receivable in a rack mountable shelf having a service processor.                                        
                       Representative independent claim 12 is reproduced as follows:                                                 
                       12.     A server blade configured to be removably receivable in a rack mountable                              
                       shelf having a service processor, the server blade comprising:                                                
                               a processor, and                                                                                      
                               a blade service controller, the blade service controller operable to transmit a                       
                       signal to the service processor to identify the server blade as a particular one of a                         
                       predetermined set of server blade types.                                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007