Ex Parte Potter - Page 1




                                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered                             
                                   today was not written for publication and is not                               
                                          binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                                                                                 
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                                 _____________                                                    
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                                 _____________                                                    
                                         Ex parte DOUGLAS D. POTTER                                               
                                                 _____________                                                    
                                              Appeal No. 2006-1963                                                
                                            Application No. 09/951,321                                            
                                             Technology Center 3700                                               
                                                 ______________                                                   
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                      
                                                _______________                                                   
                Before CRAWFORD, NAPPI and FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               
                                                                                                                 
                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    

                       This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. §134(a) of the final rejection of             
                claims 28 through 47.  For the reasons stated infra we affirm the examiner’s rejection of         
                these claims.                                                                                     
                                                    Invention                                                     
                       The invention relates to an incentive based method for training over a                     
                communication network wherein the trainees are also tested.   See pages 6 and 7 of the            
                appellant’s specification.    Claim 28 is representative of the invention and reproduced          
                below:                                                                                            








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007