The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DINESH KASHINATH ANVEKAR, BHASKARPILLAI GOPINATH,
RAJIV MANGLA and SRIDHAR SUNDARAM
__________
Appeal No. 2006-1978
Application No. 10/027,572
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-19,
which are all of the claims pending in this application.
The disclosed invention relates to a short message service (SMS) message
system in which a separate SMS exchange system implements value-added service
capability. More particularly, the value-added services range from a simple data
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007