THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte PAUL J. GARNETT and PETER HEFFERNAN __________ Appeal No. 2006-1998 Application No. 10/215,648 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-29, 31, and 32. Claim 30 has been indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter and is not on appeal before us. The invention is directed to a modular computer system, best illustrated by reference to representative independent claim 1, reproduced as follows: 1. A carrier for a modular computer system, the carrier having a plurality of receiving locations each configured removably to receive at least one information processing module, wherein each receiving location is further configured to receive aPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007