Ex Parte Paterson et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                     Ex parte GRAHAM H. PATERSON and MICHAEL W. BOYER                                         
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2006-2026                                                 
                                           Application 10/300,334                                             
                                          Technology Center 3700                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Decided:  December 5, 2006                                            
                                               ____________                                                   
                Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                      This appeal involves claims 16-22.  We have jurisdiction over the                       
                appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                           
                      We REVERSE.                                                                             











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007