Appeal No. 2006-2028
Application No. 09/814,159
Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of these claims under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Ginter.
Claims 5 and 26 depend upon claims 1 and 22 respectively. The examiner has
rejected these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Ginter in view of
Chui. The examiner has not asserted nor do we find that Chui teaches or suggests
modifying Ginter to include the gateway and tracking features discussed with respect to
claims 1 and 22. Accordingly, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 5
and 26.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007