The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ALBERT J. WEIL, E. KEITH ADAMS, and JEFFREY L. MOORMAN ____________ Appeal 2006-2045 Application 10/284,357 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: October 23, 2006 ____________ Before WALTZ, JEFFERY T. SMITH, and FRANKLIN, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 26 through 38, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to Appellants, the invention is directed to a curtain or bedspread formed of a woven fabric which includes textured warp and weltPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007