Ex Parte Scherb et al - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                 
                    for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        
                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                     
                                             ___________                                                 
                               BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                        
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                             ___________                                                 
                  Ex parte THOMAS THOROE SCHERB and HARALD SCHMIDT-HEBBEL                                
                                             ___________                                                 
                                        Appeal No. 2006-2066                                             
                                    Application No. 10/743,461                                           
                                      Technology Center 1700                                             
                                             ___________                                                 
                                      HEARD: October 17, 2006                                            
                                             ___________                                                 
            Before OWENS, WALTZ, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
            OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                  This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-33, which are                              
            all of the pending claims.                                                                   
                                            THE INVENTION                                                
                  The appellants claim a machine for manufacturing a fiber                               
            material web, particularly tissue paper or a hygienic paper web.                             
            Claim 1 is illustrative:                                                                     
                  1. A machine for the manufacture of a fiber material web,                              
            comprising:                                                                                  
            a shoe pressing unit;                                                                        





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007