Appeal No. 2006-2068 Application No. 09/854,693 the golf ball has a specific gravity of not less than 0.5 and less than 1.0, and a deformation amount (D) of 3.0 to 6.0 mm when applying from an initial load of 98 N to a final load of 1275 N, and a ratio (F/D) of the flexural modulus of the cover (F) to the deformation amount of the golf ball (D) is within the range of 24 to 31. THE REFERENCE The reference relied upon by the examiner is: Yoshimasa et al. (Yoshimasa) JP 06-327791 Nov. 29, 1994 THE REJECTION AT ISSUE Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshimasa. The examiner’s rejection is set forth on pages 2 and 3 of the Answer. Throughout the opinion we make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof. OPINION We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejection advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, appellant’s arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner’s rationale in support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer. With full consideration being given to the subject matter on appeal, the examiner’s rejection and the arguments of appellant and the examiner, for the reasons stated infra we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007