The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES Ex parte STEVEN TSENGAS Appeal No. 2006-2087 Application No. 10/960,252 ON BRIEF Before KIMLIN, JEFFREY T. SMITH and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges. KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-3. Claim 1 is illustrative: 1. A rawhide-based product comprising: rawhide that is ground into a powder and consists of 40.5% by weight based upon the weight; water of 20.5% by weight; modified corn starch of 10% by weight; -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007