Ex Parte Gusler et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                            
                                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                       


                                 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                          __________                                                              
                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                          __________                                                              
                 Ex parte  CARL PHILLIP GUSLER, RICK ALLEN HAMILTON II, and HARRY SCHATZ                                          
                                                          __________                                                              
                                                    Appeal No.  2006-2090                                                         
                                                  Application No. 10/004,925                                                      
                                                         ___________                                                              
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                               
                                                         ___________                                                              

               Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             



                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                      This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 30.                                          
                      The disclosed invention relates to a method and system for monitoring use of an instant                     
               messaging source user account.  When an instant message is received, a registry is searched to                     
               determine the identity of the destination user.  If the destination user is identified in the registry             
               as an approved destination user, then a transcript of the received message is not made.  On the                    
               other hand, if the destination user is not identified in the registry as an approved destination user,             
               then a transcript of the received message is made.                                                                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007