Appeal No. 2006-2103
Application No. 09/780,817
Schmeidler and Berger, we do not sustain this rejection as well. The Schmeidler and Berger
references have been added to Fisher by the Examiner to address, respectively, the graphical
user interface and target password change policy features set forth in the rejected dependent
claims. We find nothing, however, in the disclosures of Schmeidler or Berger, taken
individually or collectively, which would overcome the innate deficiencies of Fisher
discussed supra.
In summary, we have not sustained either of the Examiner’s rejections of the claims
on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-27 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR/rwk
-6-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007