The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAMES D. PARSONS
____________
Appeal No. 2006-2104
Application No. 10/655,9041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, SAADAT, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-21. Claims
22-26 have been allowed and claim 6 has been objected to as being
dependent upon a rejected base claim but otherwise allowable if
rewritten to include all the limitations of the base claim and
any intervening claim.
We affirm.
1 Application for patent filed September 5, 2003, which according to
Appellant, is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 09/906,441, filed July
16, 2001, now U.S. Patent No. 6,713,762.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007