The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JESSE PERLA, DALE BAIK and KARTIK SHAH ____________ Appeal No. 2006-2106 Application No. 09/837,6321 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRY, and SAADAT , Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s final rejection of claim 1, which is the only claims pending in this application. We affirm. 1 1 Application for patent filed April 19, 2001, which claims the foreign filing priority benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of the Canadian Applications No. CANADA 2,297,596, CANADA 2,297,597 and CANADA 2,297,711, all filed January 31, 2000. Additionally, According to Appellants, this Application is a continuation of PCT Application No. PCT/CA01/00149, filed January 31, 2001, and a continuation-in-part of Application No. 09/471,135, filed December 23, 1999, now abandoned.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007