Ex Parte Walke et al - Page 1




                          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written             
                                 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                 
                                                  __________                                                     
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                  __________                                                     
                          Ex parte D. WADE WALKE, NATHANIEL L. WILGANOWSKI,                                      
                                       and C. ALEXANDER TURNER JR.,                                              
                                                  __________                                                     
                                             Appeal No. 2006-2131                                                
                                           Application No. 10/309,422                                            
                                                  __________                                                     
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                      
                                                  __________                                                     
             Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
             GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                

                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final                  
             rejection of claims 1, 3, and 6-11, all of the claims remaining.  Claim 3 is representative         
             and reads as follows:                                                                               
                   3. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence that                    
             encodes the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:16 or SEQ ID NO: 28.                             
                   The examiner does not rely on any references.                                                 
                   Claims 1, 3, and 6-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 112, first                    
             paragraph, for lack of patentable utility.                                                          
                   We affirm.                                                                                    







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007