The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte D. WADE WALKE, NATHANIEL L. WILGANOWSKI, and C. ALEXANDER TURNER JR., __________ Appeal No. 2006-2131 Application No. 10/309,422 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before SCHEINER, GRIMES, and LINCK, Administrative Patent Judges. GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3, and 6-11, all of the claims remaining. Claim 3 is representative and reads as follows: 3. An isolated nucleic acid molecule comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:16 or SEQ ID NO: 28. The examiner does not rely on any references. Claims 1, 3, and 6-11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 112, first paragraph, for lack of patentable utility. We affirm.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007