Ex Parte Rohr et al - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                          
                       written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                        

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                 
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                     
                                              ________________                                                   
                           Ex parte CARSTEN ROHR, KEITH W.J. BARNHAM,                                            
                          NICHOLAS EKINS-DAUKES, JAMES P. CONNOLLY,                                              
                               IAN M. BALLARD, and MASSIMO MAZZER                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                                              Appeal 2006-2150                                                   
                                            Application 09/955,297                                               
                                           Technology Center 1700                                                
                                              ________________                                                   
                                         Decided:  December 8, 2006                                              
                                              ________________                                                   
                Before GARRIS, WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative                                      
                Patent Judges.                                                                                   
                GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             


                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    
                       This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-18, 20-27,                        
                31-33, and 35-58.                                                                                
                       The subject matter on appeal relates to a photovoltaic device                             
                comprising a plurality of quantum wells and barriers having tensile strained                     
                layers and compressively strained layers wherein these layers have                               
                                                                                                                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007