The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte CARSTEN ROHR, KEITH W.J. BARNHAM, NICHOLAS EKINS-DAUKES, JAMES P. CONNOLLY, IAN M. BALLARD, and MASSIMO MAZZER ________________ Appeal 2006-2150 Application 09/955,297 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: December 8, 2006 ________________ Before GARRIS, WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-18, 20-27, 31-33, and 35-58. The subject matter on appeal relates to a photovoltaic device comprising a plurality of quantum wells and barriers having tensile strained layers and compressively strained layers wherein these layers havePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007