Ex Parte Hekal et al - Page 3


             Appeal No. 2006-2153                                                                                
             Application 10/447,199                                                                              

             nonobviousness based on the record as a whole, giving due consideration to the weight of            
             appellants’ arguments in the brief and reply brief.  See generally, In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443,   
             1445, 24 USPQ2d 1443, 1444 (Fed. Cir. 1992); In re Piasecki, 745 F.2d 1468, 1472, 223 USPQ          
             785, 788 (Fed. Cir. 1984).                                                                          
                   We agree with the examiner’s findings of fact from the references and conclusions of law      
             based on this substantial evidence as set forth in the answer, to which we add the following for    
             emphasis.                                                                                           
                   There is no dispute that the claimed method differs from the method of Chen solely in         
             that the reference would have disclosed to one of ordinary skill in this art a method in which the  
             preservative compositions for fresh produce contain ascorbate and/or erythorbate ions and           
             calcium ions, the latter obtained from, among others, calcium chloride, but not magnesium ions;     
             and that Warren ‘522 would have disclosed to this person that preservative compositions for         
             fresh produce contain ascorbate and/or erythorbate ions and chloride ions, the latter obtained      
             from, among others salts, calcium chloride and/or magnesium chloride which would provide the        
             alkaline earth metal ions calcium and/or magnesium to the composition.                              
                   Appellants submit that one of ordinary skill in this art would not have combined the          
             teachings of Chen and Warren ‘522 as applied by the examiner because Chen would have taught         
             the presence of the calcium ion only, and Warren ‘522 would have required that “incidental          
             magnesium must be sequestered by an additional additive to prevent food degradation” (brief,        
             page 7; see also page 4).  Thus, appellants would have us hold that “[o]nly by reading applicant’s  
             [sic] specification would one appreciate that magnesium ion [sic] as a preservative with ascorbic   
             acid” (brief, page 7; see also page 5).  The examine responds that Warren ‘522 would have           
             taught “using either calcium or magnesium in a vegetable preservative composition” and thus,        
             would have led one of ordinary skill in this art to use magnesium ions in place of calcium ions in  
             the preservative composition of Chen in view of the use of ascorbate or erythorbate ions in the     
             preservative compositions for fresh produce of both references and that calcium and magnesium       
             are both alkaline earth metals ions which would have been expected to perform in the same or        
             similar manner with the same composition components (answer, e.g., pages 6-7).                      
                                                                                                                 
             matured. Thus, a discussion of Warren ‘313 is not necessary to our decision. See In re Kronig,      

                                                      - 3 -                                                      



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007