Ex Parte Hayduk - Page 5



             Appeal No. 2006-2154                                                  Page 5                     
             Application No. 10/786,998                                                                          
             to minimize wear (Berchem’ 004, col. 1, lines 41-49).  We agree with the                            
             examiner’s reading of Berchem ‘004, and find that Berchem ‘004 teaches the                          
             equivalency of a ball valve with a disc slide valve (Answer, p. 3) inasmuch as                      
             Berchem ‘004 teaches that the same materials can be used to make both types of                      
             valves.  Specifically, Berchem ‘004 teaches that the valve seat of the ball valve                   
             embodiment and the sealing discs of the disc slide embodiment can be made of the                    
             same material (Berchem ‘004, col. 4, lines 62-67 (teaching that the seating rings (5                
             and 6) of the ball valve embodiment can be made from silicon carbide or zirconium                   
             oxide) and col. 4, lines 39-41 (teaching that the sealing discs (14a and 14b) of the                
             disc slide embodiment can similarly be made from silicon carbide or zirconium                       
             oxide).  We also find that Berchem ‘004 teaches that the same materials can be                      
             used to make the ball of the ball valve embodiment and the slide plate of the disc                  
             slide embodiment (Berchem ‘004, col. 4, lines 3-5 (teaching that the ball (4) of the                
             ball valve embodiment can be composed of one of:  aluminum oxide, silicon                           
             carbide, silicon nitride, or zirconium oxide) and col. 4, lines 41-43 (teaching that                
             plate (16) of the disc slide embodiment can similarly be made from aluminum                         
             oxide, silicon carbide or silicon nitride).                                                         
                   With regard to the differences between the prior art and the claimed                          
             invention, we find that Berchem ‘427 teaches the use of quartz glass2 for the valve                 
             seat and shut-off element of a ball valve (Berchem, Figure 1).  Berchem ‘427 does                   
             not explicitly teach, however, using quartz glass for the valve seat and slide                      
             element of a disc slide valve.  As discussed above, although we find that Berchem                   

                                                                                                                
             2 The appellant does not contest the examiner’s finding that “silicon dioxide is the chemical       
             name for quartz glass.”  (Final Office Action, p. 2 and Brief, p. 4)                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007