Ex Parte JAURA et al - Page 1

                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                             
               was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                            
                                           of the Board.                                               
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                             __________                                                
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                             __________                                                
                         Ex parte ARUN KUMAR JAURA and CHAN-WOO PARK                                   
                                             __________                                                
                                      Appeal No.  2006-2161                                            
                                  Application No.  10/248,3261                                         
                                             __________                                                
                                              ON BRIEF                                                 
                                             __________                                                
               Before GRON, HANLON, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent                                
               Judges.                                                                                 
               GRON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      
                                        Decision On Appeal                                             
                     This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                  
               examiner’s final rejection of Claims 1-20 of Application                                
               No. 10/248,326, filed January 9, 2003.  Claims 1-20 are all                             
               the claims pending in the application.  Appellant has not                               
               argued Claims 1-20 separately.  Thus, the rejections of                                 
               Claims 1-20 stand or fall together.  In re Kaslow, 707 F.2d                             
               1366, 1376, 217 USPQ 1089, 1096 (Fed. Cir. 1983).                                       
               1.  Introduction                                                                        
                     The invention claimed is directed to a method and                                 
               system for enhancing the performance of multi-cell batteries                            
               used to power electric vehicles by improving heat transfer                              
                                                                                                       
               1     Filed January 9, 2003                                                             




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007