The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte VICTOR W. THOMAS, SR., ROBERT K. KAY,
JAYANT SHARMA, PHILIP R. MASS, ROSARIO ROBERT,
COLIN ANGLE, LEE F. SWORD, JOSEPH L. JONES,
PAUL E. SANDIN, JOHN P. O’BRIEN, BENJAMIN L. WIRZ,
MARK CHIAPPETTA and GIDEON COITOF
______________
Appeal 2006-2180
Application 10/752,180
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 28, 2006
_______________
Before WARREN, KRATZ, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 6, 9 through 11, 13 through 15,
42 through 44, and 51 through 62. Claims 12, 45 through 50, and 63
through 68 have been allowed by the Examiner.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007