Ex Parte Harif - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                            Ex parte SHLOMI HARIF                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              Appeal No.   2006-2193                                                   
                                            Application No. 09/751,823                                                 
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                     ON BRIEF                                                          
                                                   ____________                                                        
                 Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and MACDONALD, Administrative Patent                                         
                 Judges.                                                                                               
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      

                        Appellant has appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final                                  
                 rejection of claims 1 through 3 and 5 through 26, appellant having canceled                           
                 claim 4.                                                                                              









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007