Ex Parte Gann et al - Page 2



              Appeal No. 2006-2199                                                                                         
              Application No. 09/845,391                                                                                   

                     1. A photosensor assembly, comprising:                                                                
                            a plurality of sets of lines of photosensors, each set                                         
                     comprising at least a first line and a second line, where                                             
                     photosensors in the first line and second line have                                                   
                     substantially the same pitch, and where photosensors in the                                           
                     first line are offset relative to photosensors in the second                                          
                     line by approximately one-half the pitch, and where the                                               
                     spectral bandwidth of light received by the first line is                                             
                     different than the spectral bandwidth of the light received                                           
                     by the second line.                                                                                   
                     The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                         
              Nakamura et al. (Nakamura) 5,025,282   June 18, 1991                                                         
              Kusaka et al. (Kusaka)  5,652,664   July 29, 1997                                                            
              Decker et al. (Decker)  6,570,615   May  27, 2003                                                            
                     Claims 1 through 4 and 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                             
              unpatentable over Decker in view of Nakamura.                                                                
                     Claims 5, 8 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable                       
              over Decker in view of Nakamura and Kusaka.                                                                  
                     Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the respective positions of the                    
              appellant and the examiner.                                                                                  
                                                        OPINION                                                            
                     We have carefully considered the entire record before us, and we will reverse the                     
              obviousness rejections of claims 1 through 6, 8 and 9.                                                       


                     We agree with the examiner’s finding (answer, page 3) that Decker describes a                         
              photosensor assembly (Figure 2) that comprises “a plurality of sets of lines of photo-                       
              sensors, each set comprising at least a first line and a second line, where photo-                           
                                                            2                                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007