The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte FARZAD PARSAPOUR ____________ Appeal 2006-2237 Application 10/153,764 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 28, 2006 ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6, and 8 through 14, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of manufacturing color filters on a luminescent screen assembly of a color cathode-ray tube, where the color filters are formed between the faceplatePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007