Ex Parte Parsapour - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                    
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                             
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                            Ex parte FARZAD PARSAPOUR                                                             
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                                     Appeal 2006-2237                                                             
                                                  Application 10/153,764                                                          
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                          
                                                        ____________                                                              
                                              Decided:  September 28, 2006                                                        
                                                        ____________                                                              

                   Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
                   WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                               
                          This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s Final                                       
                   Rejection of claims 1, 3 through 6, and 8 through 14, which are the only                                       
                   claims pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to                                          
                   35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                                               
                          According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a method of                                        
                   manufacturing color filters on a luminescent screen assembly of a color                                        
                   cathode-ray tube, where the color filters are formed between the faceplate                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007