Appeal No. 2006-2267 Application No. 09/916,537 The obviousness rejection of claims 14, 15 and 17 through 20 is likewise reversed because the teachings of Lynch fail to cure the noted shortcoming in the teachings of Kennedy, Goheen and Berger. DECISION The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through 15 and 17 through 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) is reversed. REVERSED ) KENNETH W. HAIRSTON ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge ) KWH:pgc 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007