The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOEY GLORIOSO, JAMES H. BURGESS, and JIANSHENG TANG ____________ Appeal 2006-2270 Application 10/478,569 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: September 26, 2006 ____________ Before KRATZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims 1-25, the only claims pending in this application.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 An Oral Hearing took place on September 14, 2006.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007