Appeal No. 2006-2275 Page 7
Application No. 09/731,998
appear to be unreasonable and appellants never offer any substantive arguments
thereagainst.
Moreover, for appellants’ benefit, we attach hereto a copy of the provisional
application which took us all of five minutes to download and copy.
The examiner’s decision, rejecting claims 1-6, 8-18, 20-29, 31-41, 43-52, 54-64,
and 66-69 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) and claims 7, 19, 30, 42, 53, and 65 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103, is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
)
Errol A. Krass )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Lance Leonard Barry )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
Allen R. MacDonald )
Administrative Patent Judge )
EAK/eld
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007