The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte QIN LIU, CHARLES C. HALUZAK, MARZIO LEBAN,
LAWRENCE R. PLOTKIN, AND KENNETH E. TRUEBA
______________
Appeal 2006-2320
Application 10/061,830
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: October 27, 2006
_______________
Before WARREN, WALTZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
REMAND TO THE EXAMINER
We remand the Application to the Examiner for consideration and
explanation of issues raised by the record. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(a)(1) (2006);
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1211 (8th ed., Rev. 3,
August 2005).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007